Komninos Chatzipapas (Κομνηνός Χατζηπαπάς), Founder of Omicron AI Software.
Before comparing AI products, you need to understand the difference between an AI model and an AI tool.
AI models are the underlying intelligence. GPT-5.6, Claude Fable and Grok 4.5 are examples of models. AI tools are the applications built around those models. ChatGPT is a tool that gives you access to GPT-5.6. Claude Code is a tool that uses Claude models. The model determines much of the raw capability, while the tool determines what you can actually do with it.
This distinction matters because businesses often compare tools without looking at the models, restrictions and workflows underneath them.
The most flexible way to use AI is usually through a model’s API. An API lets you control the prompts, data, tool access, user interface and surrounding business logic. You can build something that fits your workflow instead of changing your workflow to fit somebody else’s software.
Of course, most businesses do not have the technical ability or resources to build directly on an API. That is understandable. However, you should still try to get as close to that level of flexibility as you reasonably can.
I have seen businesses spend months configuring third-party AI wrapper software. They connect their documents, create automations, train employees and modify internal processes around the product. Eventually, they discover that the software handles 80% of what they need but cannot support the remaining 20%. That final 20% is often where the real business value is. The company then has to abandon the tool or build a custom system anyway, wasting much of the original work.
This is why flexibility should be one of your main selection criteria. You should ask whether the tool can access your files, use external services, run multi-step tasks and adapt as your requirements change. You should also consider how easily you can export your data and move to another provider.
For businesses that want flexibility, agent-style tools are worth considering. Products such as Codex and Claude Code can inspect information, use external tools, complete multi-step tasks and verify parts of their own work. Although they originated in software development, their usefulness increasingly extends into research, operations, content production and other forms of knowledge work.
Their main advantage is not any single feature. It is that they place a relatively lightweight layer around a capable model, allowing the model to work across tools and adapt to different processes without locking the user into one narrowly defined workflow.
Integration support is an important part of this flexibility. Tools that support standards such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP) can connect to external services and add capabilities that are not built into the core product. This may include internal databases, business applications or specialist creative tools such as video-generation platforms.
There is no universally best option. Codex may be convenient for businesses already using ChatGPT, while Claude Code may suit teams that prefer Anthropic’s models and ecosystem. Other products, including Kimi Work, may be more appealing for desktop automation or particular knowledge-work use cases. The right choice will depend on the models available, the integrations supported, the level of technical control and the restrictions imposed by the product.
The main principle is simple: Do not choose a tool solely because it has the longest feature list. Choose one that gives you enough room to adapt, integrate and eventually build the workflow your business actually needs.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
