In long-term relationships, and sometimes even in short-term ones, partners can often find themselves stuck in a cycle of familiar arguments. They talk about the issue, resolve it even, breathe a sigh of relief, until one day again, weeks or months later, with disappointing predictability, the conflict resurfaces.
Couples often interpret this recurrence as a sign of deeper incompatibility. They grapple might with questions such as, “Are we missing something?”, “Are we doing this wrong?” or even, “Why can’t we fix this?”
Psychological research offers a different, strangely reassuring perspective: 69% of relationship conflicts are perpetual.
This finding, emerging from decades of longitudinal data from studies by John Gottman, is one of the most replicated insights in relationship science. Despite its slightly grim-sounding premise, it contains a powerful truth. Essentially, most recurring conflicts persist for one core reason, and understanding that reason can fundamentally change the way you show up in your relationship.
Here are two reasons why people get stuck so easily in a cycle of perpetual conflict.
We Rarely Address The Core Of Conflict
Couples often assume they are fighting about chores, finances, parenting decisions, emotional availability, sex, punctuality or how often the in-laws visit. These appear to be practical, very discreet and easily solvable issues. Yet, a litany of research consistently shows that these surface-level topics are rarely the true source of tension.
A recent observational study of 141 couples published in Frontiers in Psychology found that partners’ emotional reactions during conflict were driven not by the task or topic itself, but rather by the underlying relational need being threatened.
When people in relationships experienced autonomy frustration (feeling controlled or restricted), they showed negative disengaging emotions like anger and irritation. But when they experienced relatedness frustration (feeling disconnected or unsupported), they expressed negative engaging emotions like hurt, sadness and disappointment.
This aligns with clinical observations too. The real reason behind a conflict is much deeper and stems from the meanings we assign to them. For instance,
- A disagreement about household chores might actually be about wanting to feel respected and supported or needing shared responsibility
- Arguments about money often signal deeper anxieties around safety, autonomy or childhood experiences with scarcity
- Conflicts around how you spend your time together usually track back to needs for closeness, autonomy, relational space, identity and sensory regulation
In short, a conflict activates deeper psychological needs before the content of the argument even becomes apparent. And because these needs stem from long-standing patterns shaped by temperament, attachment histories and early family experiences, they remain relatively stable across adulthood. The conflicts rooted in them, in most cases, remain stable as well.
So, as uncomfortable as it may sound, most of the time, you’re not fighting about what you think you’re fighting about. You’re often responding to the psychological subtext or the threatened need that the argument and its subject matter bring up for you. The hard pill to swallow here is that you can’t permanently “solve” a symbol, a history or a value. However, you can understand it, name it and work your way around it with far more clarity and compassion.
Perpetual Conflict Is Neither New, Nor A Death Sentence
When two people come together in a partnership, their internal worlds overlap. Friction is an inevitabilite result of this overlap, given the uniqueness each partner brings with respect to their:
- Nervous systems
- Emotional logic
- Relational pace
- Conflict and communication styles
These differences usually become the underlying reason behind any couple’s “perpetual conflict.” The reason is simple: the partner who thrives in routine and predictability is not going to magically become spontaneous. Similarly, a partner who processes emotions internally will never transform into someone who verbalizes everything instantly.
This implies two things:
- Recurring conflicts are predictable. They tend to recur in the same clusters: personality differences, lifestyle rhythms, emotional needs and core values.
- Recurring conflicts do not indicate an inherently flawed relationship. Nor do they indicate poor communication skills, lack of effort or incompatibility. They are simply indicators of normal human variation.
The issue arises when couples get stuck in what John Gottman terms as “gridlock” — a state of being stuck in a loop of emotionally loaded conflict characterized by defensiveness, criticism, contempt and stonewalling (the four horsemen of divorce). A gridlock forms because the meaning underneath it struggles to come to the surface and be witnessed.
For example, a partner might fight fiercely about being on time because lateness triggers memories of being dismissed or devalued growing up. Another partner may resist budgeting conversations because money symbolizes freedom, self-worth or relief from a chaotic childhood.
To soften the edges of a gridlocked relationship, one needs to learn how to trace the conflict back to its meaning.
How Healthy Couples Manage Conflict
Couples who navigate the 69% successfully do not “solve” these issues. They incorporate the following five practices into their daily life and relationship conversations:
- They don’t fantasize about total resolution. They accept that certain differences are enduring, and this acceptance creates emotional breathing room. When partners stop desperately hoping for a conflict vanish forever, they can finally explore it without fear or defensiveness.
- They approach conflicts with curiosity. Curiosity shifts the focus from proving a point to looking for meaning. “Help me understand what this symbolizes for you” reflects a far more connective tone than, “We’ve talked about this a thousand times.”
- They focus on the soft emotion under the sharp reaction. Most gridlocked conflict dissolves when partners move from criticism to vulnerability. It is after this shift that they are able to access what deeper fear or longing the conflict activates.
- They work through collaborations instead of solutions. Instead of speed-running toward quick or permanent fixes, healthy couples spend their precious energy on ongoing collaboration. As a result, they are able to create small rituals that allow both partners’ needs to coexist.
- They see recurring conflicts as information, not failure. Each recurrence becomes an opportunity to understand a partner’s inner world more fully. Over time, these conversations make way for deeper empathy.
Recurring conflict isn’t a sign that you chose the wrong person. Take the Affective Empathy Scale to find out if you understand where the conflict stems from in your bond.