Jerry Haywood, CEO of boost.ai, is a technology and customer‑engagement executive with decades of leadership across enterprise software.
Enterprise spending on AI is soaring. Corporations have doubled their AI budgets this year, and businesses of every size and in every sector are pouring money into the nascent technology, hoping to gain a competitive edge at the forefront of the next technological revolution.
In total, Gartner estimates that businesses will allocate $2.59 trillion to AI spending in 2026. It’s an easy line item for executives to approve. After all, nobody ever lost their job because they invested in the unanimously determined next big thing.
However, as more businesses invest in and adopt the technology, it becomes more difficult to determine if businesses are receiving a return on their investment. Instead of radical transformation, many businesses are only seeing incremental improvements.
Several high-profile studies, including a widely discussed MIT study, found that most organizations are not seeing a return on investment from their AI spending. As Atlassian’s own research found, “96% of companies have not seen dramatic improvements in organizational efficiency, innovation, or work quality.”
The technology is already performing impressively across a variety of tasks, and it’s only going to get more capable. Businesses aren’t seeing the AI ROI they want because they haven’t dismantled their processes and remade their organizational workflows to harness AI’s power and potential.
Measuring Company Readiness For AI Transformation
Many leadership teams view AI deployments as just another instance of software procurement. They learn the benefits, purchase the licenses and wait for the magic to happen.
Organizational transformation doesn’t work like that, and history is full of examples of disruptive technologies that took a really long time to do much disrupting.
When electricity replaced steam power in manufacturing settings, many manufacturing leaders simply disconnected their central steam engines and replaced them with electric motors. They left the rest of their infrastructure unchanged.
This created a productivity paradox: New technology combined with outdated architecture stagnated productivity, resulting in a plateau that lasted nearly three decades. History may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.
We regularly encounter clients whose enterprise automation initiatives achieve complete technical validation yet fail spectacularly at the operational level.
The problem often comes from the business’s architecture. Consider a customer who starts a conversation with an AI chatbot, gets escalated to a support agent and gets transferred to a specialist, re-explaining the issue each time. The technology is capable of keeping context but the business processes are not in place to make the connection.
In contrast, the companies that see the most transformation actually redesign their operating models to make the most of their AI investments.
McKinsey & Company calls this the 70-20-10 rule: 70% of the business value from an AI program comes from people, culture and process change; 20% comes from data infrastructure; and a mere 10% stems from the actual AI algorithms.
In other words, how people use and apply the technology is as important as the technology itself, and failing to rearchitect workflows around it risks relegating ROI to individual tasks, which is not what executives anticipated when they committed to these massive investments.
Integrating AI Without Compromise
AI tools are at their best when they augment human capability. High-performing systems deployed across teams can streamline high-volume, mundane tasks, surface highly contextual data points, preserve historical interaction records across departments, optimize complex decision pathways and drastically shorten the overall time-to-insight.
This leaves the critical components of the business, such as empathy, creative problem-solving, strategic governance and complex prioritization, confidently in human hands.
Unfortunately, many organizations accidentally create AI dependence, atrophying their talent in the name of efficiency or innovation. As a result, employees stop developing expertise, teams start blindly embracing AI recommendations, system outputs go unexamined and the entire organization grinds to a halt when AI is unavailable.
We’ve experienced some of these pitfalls firsthand when integrating AI into our own operations. In the process, we’ve created a precise, highly effective workflow that successful enterprises can use to scale AI initiatives with confidence and excellence. The four components include:
Intelligent Customer Routing
Start your organizational transformation by using AI to analyze incoming queries and route them perfectly to the right destination.
Transactional Automation
Once routing mechanisms work, introduce targeted automation for highly predictable, transactional actions.
Context Preservation
Capture and preserve comprehensive customer context across all platforms before modifying internal employee workflows.
Expanded Automation
After these foundational layers are solidified, expand advanced automation across broader operational environments.
This progressive, phased framework prevents the sudden implementation shocks that trigger employee pushback or ineffective usage. It controls costs, ensuring that every dollar spent is moving your company toward a clear objective, not just filling a token-maxing leaderboard.
Front-line staff begin to trust the automated systems because the technology consistently resolves administrative friction rather than creating systemic ambiguity.
AI Alone Not Enough
Mindlessly funding AI infrastructure without altering the corporate blueprint is a proven path to wasted resources and missed opportunities. Initially, the strategy looks sound, but without operational transformation, the gains quickly plateau.
True enterprise resilience comes from keeping human professionals deeply engaged, fully informed and strategically empowered, while automation handles the operational load beneath them.
Simply put, AI investment isn’t enough. Leaders can’t just buy it and forget it. They have to actively architect the operational frameworks that allow both their people and their technology to thrive.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
